Ramblings on Humanity and a Healthy Planet: There Does Not
Need to Be a Breaking Point
From the
time I studied environmental education in the 1970’s I have been sensitive to
knowing the use of non-renewable resources for consumption and development
cannot go unabated without a breaking point bringing deteriorating decline or
catastrophe or both. I remember the debate about growth and progress in an
international conference in Rome in the 70’s and a publication called “The
Limits of Growth.” The very notion of limits is a problem for us – we don’t
like to think there is a stopping point. In Laudato Si, the 2015 Papal Encyclical
on the environment there is this: “Put simply, it is a matter of redefining our
notion of progress.” It’s paternalistic and selfish of so-called First World
countries to think and say all the developing countries (and why do we use that
term ‘developing’ to describe a country?) cannot or should not all have washing
machines like everybody in the so-called developed nations (to use an actual
appliance that changes lives as a metaphor for development – see www.ted.com
for the Hans Rosling “The Magic Washing Machine”TED Talk on resource
depletion and development). Even with that, there is the necessity of a change
in defining progress since progress now is becoming or has become
earth-depleting and self-defeating. We are ravaging the planet.
This would
and will continue without what added to the equation makes it a tsunami of
hurt: an ever increasing population of human beings (not to mention that
simultaneously we are killing off hundreds of other species and creating a
monoculture that will be unsustainable). In the Daytona Beach News Journal of
June 3, 2017 (we were visiting the East Coast sand and water for some R and R)
I caught a Letter to the Editor on Volusia County development and water quality
saying “the elephant in the room” is “an every expanding population.” The
writer was talking about our inability to set limits on growth.
This, my
friends, will not go away. “This” being our critical need to reduce growth and
development while renewing the planetary environment while we redefine what it
means to progress. I left my undergrad world of
Environmental Science and went to a theological seminary for graduate
studies because in my altruism to change the world I thought there could be no
solution to the technical challenges of environmental decline until and unless
there was a change in attitude and understanding of our human relationship to
the divine and thus too to creation as a whole.
I still feel
that way but realize we in the church have not overall done a good job of
translating our faith and have it contain a direct and not indirect connection
to care of creation. The reconciled relationship with God is not realized
without the reconciled relationship to the created world. Care of creation is
not a sub-set of concern, a social issue, but rather an integral part of the
primary concern of faith. We simply do not see this. Again, Laudato Si: “the
external deserts of the world are growing because the internal deserts have
become so vast.” U.S President Trump, in announcing the US withdrawal from the
Paris Climate Accord focused on the economic and labor impact on American
citizens, with a particular emphasis on how Americans cannot and will not
afford helping other people, nations, bear the cost of transitioning to
sustainable development. This is morally bankrupt on at least 2 fronts: 1) the
US has been the prime polluter in greenhouse emissions for the past 100 years,
just recently taking 2nd place to China, and so bears the primary
responsibility for the global consequences of warming the entire planets
suffers 2) even if we disregarded this past culpability, we have current
responsibility to do all we can as much as we can for the common good, not
simply our singular best.
What are we
to do?
First, serve
God by investing time, money, wisdom and energy on all personal fronts:
advocacy, stewardship practices (i.e. consumptions, waste management, product
use all in the familiar reduce, reuse, recycle vein) to earth care.
Second, help
each other redefine progress and level the playing field so all nations can
have enough for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Third, work
with your local government to produce real zoning regulations that promote
growth in designated areas while creating real limits to urban and suburban
sprawl (see “first” above regarding advocacy).
Fourth,
raise the discussion on the limits of population growth so that our nation and
all nations create a population accord which calls for all families to have no
more than 2 children.
I know, I
know, it’s all hard, especially that last one on population limits, since we have
personal and social freedoms with which to honor and contend. But this is not
the time to be timid. This is the time to engage with as much heart and soul
and good sense that we can muster. We must listen deeply to each other and
respect each other immensely. And we must make the changes needed. Faith in God
calls for it, humanity’s and the natural world’s survival necessitates it.